Dear FEST, Below in bold you will see one sentence that links my Thoreau-vian adventure with DOS. -Erik
RECALLING THE SELF
Erik Thompson
In many traditions, the path to peace is characterized as remembering, or recalling, the essence of who we are.
“We shall not cease from exploration, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time.”
-T.S. Eliot
“We dance round in a ring and suppose,
But the Secret sits in the middle and knows.”
-Robert Frost
Recently I had a rather clear experience of an expanded sense of myself.
As I drove my daughter Grace and our friend Russell, aged 15, to our canoe embarkation point, we were all rather quiet. Grace was napping in the front seat. As we drove, I looked outside at the familiar Vermont landscape, and my experience of self quietly had my attention. I experienced a tangible stillness within- without effort or concentration of any kind. That stillness seemed enlivened in my awareness by the simple action of looking out at the passing scene. The relative quietness of the riders did not cause this experience. Nor was it caused by the beauty of the scene. It seemed caused by the pure mental quietude ripened by meditation practice. The wooden houses and green spring lawns, the flowering fruit trees and frisky goats, the little ponds and snow capped mountains of Vermont seemed more beautiful than before, glorified by the enriched presence of something very simple, an awakened sense of being. I have driven that road for 30 years. Today, the perceiver, the perceived, and the act of perceiving were glorified from within. The flowering beauty outside seemed rooted deep within me, an abstract inner silence, an impersonal condition of the perceiver that became a vibrating quality of the perceived.
Later, when we were boating on the still water, I was alone in my kayak with our small terrier Oscar. I experienced this inner silence even more tangibly. A tiny smile, far smaller than a half-smile, flickered over my face unbidden. Its external tininess contrasted with a sense of vastness within. I recalled the same tiny smile in a renaissance painting of Mother Mary that I saw last week. As with the man on the water, the human qualities of the woman in the painting were humble, but her inner qualities were radiant. Perhaps that is why people still look at this painting 400 years after it was created.
To the outer world, there was nothing different about the man in his kayak, paddling in the South Slang of the Little Otter Creek in Ferrisburgh, Vermont in the April flood. But to the man himself, the muddy water had changed to wine. Its ripples were stirred by the hand of a vast silence within and around him. Its yellow-brown reeds quivered with being. The silence of nature has always called to those seeking peace. Yet how many paddlers have tried to flee yammering misery on the water in vain?
Certainly, I have. For the most part, when paddling, I have been rather happy, somewhat content, fairly appreciative. But today I was liberated. The rock my contentment rested upon seemed beyond nature, deeper than the lake bottom, wider than the vast grey sky that surrounded me.
What on earth does this mean?
The experience was “tangible” (from the Latin “tangere” meaning touch). As tangible as a wooden paddle, yet so abstract. What I touched was as close to me as my very own self. What could ever be closer than that which perceives all that we experience?
This aspect of myself had the following qualities:
• It was silent, meaning It sat in stillness behind all the sounds I heard, an audibly inaudible background.
• It was still, meaning that amidst all my movements it was unmoving. As my eyes moved, it did not move. As my limbs moved, it did not move. My heart beat, but it did not beat.
• It was expansive. Just as one feels that the breeze, when it faintly stimulates the skin, comes from somewhere beyond the river, so I felt this tangible stillness to be from somewhere beyond all space and time.
(Was this transcendental thought put into my mind by poetry? Was it a precious fantasy? I don’t think so. Scripture becomes fascinating to the degree that it reminds us of something we have touched.)
• I have read the word “unbounded” over and again in ancient wisdom. What I am describing had this quality. Being beyond size, it seemed sizable. Being beyond space, it seemed spacious. Being beyond boundaries, it silently whispered that I was boundless.
Here is a short list of the specific boundaries that were loosened during this experience:
• Pain- because it showed me that I am made of delight.
• Suffering- because it is a safe harbor that coexists with, yet transcends, all storms, emotional and circumstantial.
• Locality- because it brought a sense of non-locality to our lake. I knew this aspect of myself would be present anywhere. Wherever I will be, there I can find this. I could be at my daughter’s deathbed. It would be there.
• Conception- because this experience was pre-conceptual. Concepts describe it but are not It. (It is the same with all psychological concepts including Differentiation of Self.)
• Mortality- because it seemed immortal it communicated a sense of immortality to me.
• Psychological boundaries between me, my daughter Grace and Russell were refined. The teens desired to be out of sight and earshot. I celebrated their rising independence. It released rather than pained me. I was differentiated from them on a personal level, even as our separateness was dissolved on the impersonal level.
Speaking of emotional suffering, it has been a goad driving me for as long as I can remember being Erik. For some reason I was born to suffer emotionally yet born to run toward freedom. At age six in Maryland, I wanted to race out ahead while hiking in Rock Creek Park with my parents. Later I sought out the thinner paths in the green mountains, and hitchhiked highway 80 to the Rockies, trying to free myself from a quiet tangible dread.
Though I wanted it all, I thirsted for emotional freedom more than money or status. Standing on my father and grandfather’s sturdy shoulders, I was willing to sacrifice some of the financial stability they had. There have been many sweet tastes along the way. I finally found a stable marriage, after banging my fingers with the hammer of love. “Going steady” was sweet and white, like a wedding cake. But there was blood in the batter- pain, rejection, loneliness and betrayal. I was both betrayer and betrayed, and both were shameful. No stability was found in the arms of early love.
In time, my true marriage was a safer harbor. But even that has its tides. And it is tinged with a concern. What if she dies before me? Will I be lonely?
Marriage without this may always be unstable. Perhaps only the marriage of the self with the Self is truly stable. To know that Self is delight- when that is known, then all that comes has changed. No matter what comes and goes, Self will always be waiting.
Meditation showed me a golden key to the door in the attic where stability was hidden, and that key is myself. That key can never tarnish, can be hidden but never lost. I know it may sound far-fetched, but not for me. That key is revealed when all the rushing and running, the searching and thinking, becomes still.
All the old sages say the same thing. Meditation has made their words spring to life.
When the mind lays down its head to rest, the key drops into the lock unbidden. The path is the simplest one imaginable. It is the pathless path of silence, of stilling the seeking mind, of returning to what we are.
Thank you, Erik,
There is much in this piece, but I want to respond to one idea, or reality. I am interested in a stability that is not dependent on things going well, a stability that exists when all the little things in a day go wrong, or when those closest to me are not approving. I think you are writing about it. My question is How do you sustain it? How do you have an inner stability when things go wrong? I recently attended a talk by Jan Frazier, and she spoke of her own grief as well as things she has to attend to before she can go outside, which she loves. But unlike me, she seems to have a way of still having a sense of enjoyment within herself. I know I resist being in the present moment, but if I were happy and at peace within myself, I woukd not mind paying attention! Thanks again, Laurie
You ask wonderful questions. For decades you have tracked this as a key litmus test for DOS. It fascinates me as well. Both ancient and modern sources have inspiring records of remarkable freedom from inner ups and downs amidst outer ups and downs. There is a lot of nuance in these reports. Words that describe such refined subjectivity can easily be misinterpreted. I think Jan Frazier has had a breakthrough in this area.
This kind of stability comes from something very profound deep inside us. The outer world cannot provide it. This internal thing, Self, is rightly defined by BT as a property of relationships, and yet it abides in separateness, alone. It transcends relationships.
The transcendental aspect of self (Self) is a field of unchanging stability. “Being” by itself is stable. In its abstract nature the “Being” Self that underlies all doing is unchanging. However, our ability to know ourselves to be That varies.
You specifically ask about sustaining it. It can grow and regress. Our nervous systems have to become acculturated to that experience. Stability grows incrementally. The advice of my teachers is not to worry too much about the degree of progress, just keep going. Certain activities can enhance the pace of integration of self and Self, but it is a non-linear, sequential process for almost everyone. Fred Travis has a data set about this and I recently asked him for a summary- but he has not yet responded.
In my personal experience, transcendence has been an effective practice for cultivating this state of DOS. I also recommend TM retreats, which emphasize periods of more intensive inner silence. The retreats don’t emphasize a belief system, or relationship building. They speed the pace. Bowen’s warning that they are a togetherness trap was incorrect.
What fascinates me, Laurie, is to hear credible reports of remarkable inner stability amidst gain and loss.
“Whether his body is cut into a thousand pieces or he is crowned an emperor, the liberated one is liberated, even if he apparently weeps and laughs. Within himself he is neither elated nor depressed.” (The Concise Yoga Vashistha, Swami Venkatesananda, 1983 p. 387).
Erik,
It is a stretch for me to understand the kind of Self that you describe, as I am caught up in the stimulation and distraction around me most of the time. My understanding of self is to be able to stand on solid ground in the face of relationship pressures. You describe a much deeper kind of inner self. It is intriguing to think about the Self beyond self that you describe so clearly.
When I think of transcendence, it has to do with those times when people rise about their own concerns to achieve something bigger than one alone could do, or to come to a reconciliation of cutoff.
I recently had the honor of meeting a family of three, a women in her fifties with parents in their eighties, who arrived a few weeks ago from Ukraine after barely surviving for months in their destroyed home city, Mariupol. My Ukrainian daughter-in-law, Elena, knew them as close friends when she lived in Ukraine, stayed connected with them through the ordeal, kept hope alive with her encouragement, and made arrangements for them to come to this country.
We had to communicate with touches, smiles, hugs since I don’t speak Russian, but I felt that I was in the presence of the transcendence of the human spirit as I saw them making themselves at home with my son and his extraordinary wife. Your words,
“remarkable inner stability amidst gain and loss” fit perfectly.
That is beautiful Stephanie. Thank you.
Hi Erik. I’ll be interested in where you will taks the concept of the Transcendental Self. The link you made to DOS, “I was differentiated from them on a personal level, even as our separateness was dissolved on the impersonal level” seems right. With respect to what led up to this experience would you identify in addition to TM particular events in the family system and/or efforts with your position in the family system?
Laura, there has been a synergistic relationship between the inner silence practices and the work on DOS in family for 30 years. There may be a bias in our Bowen network that the family piece is primary. When I started looking for discomfirming data relevant to that assumption, it was everywhere. I think Bowen’s DOS is one of a variety of powerful variables that can lead to tastes of human liberation. Bowen was uniquely helpful in getting my marriage straightened out, and in freeing myself from the love clutch of the women in my family. I’m embracing the complexity these days. What can be hard for Bowen lifers to hear is that the level of Self in self I am tasting would not have happened without TM. Would it have happened if I had never run into Ann Bunting? I would have to say yes, I think so. My TM path has surely involved differentiation from my family of origin, who are smart and kind humanist-atheists. Love to you all. I greatly appreciate your colleagueship all these years. More than you know.
Thanks for your position here Erik. It’s been an obstacle in psychology to be able to compare subjective experiences between people. I’m sure TM and other meditative disciplines have real benefits and it makes sense to me that they would be in the arena of developing Self. I have had that experience you define as one of being “… differentiated from them on a personal level, even as our separateness was dissolved on the impersonal level’, at the inflection point of a differentiation of self in my family of origin and nuclear family, as well as on LSD as a youngster, as well as on a moonlight walk in the hills. I’m not saying this is a good thing at all, but I have not been a meditator other than I do believe I’ve developed a mindful way of living. Bowen theory has been a guide in how to think, but I think I also would have developed a mindful way of living had I had a different orientation. That being said, Bowen himself said there’s more to it than the family. I don’t know what he had in mind. My own view is that the automatic bias, and I would include myself and other individuals in the Bowen network, is to dismiss the family level when it comes to personal life and the good and bad things that happen. I want to also say, I too appreciate all you my colleagues over the years and I value the challenging voices of difference that the honest grappling with life creates. And so I look forward to more. Laura
I found this piece to be a sweet poetic way of growing and loving and seeing and being. I now live on the Potomac and went out kayaking and also found that being in nature away from others leads me to this silence and to this being. I wonder if practicing meditation or neurofeedback makes this possible. I recall Jack Calhoun talking about the mice who were one down in relationships, and how they would be lying down in the field, eyes open, until their physiology recovered. Amazing to me.
Hi Laura,
Thank you for your post here. I was reading your most recent response to Erik about meditation, mindful living, and Bowen theory. I am curious what you meant by the following;
“My own view is that the automatic bias, and I would include myself and other individuals in the Bowen network, is to dismiss the family level when it comes to personal life and the good and bad things that happen.” Like other things you have written, another interesting comment. Thanks, Laurie
Laurie, I’m just so influenced by the research I did on weight loss and watching the phenomenon in myself in others over the decades. Ask someone what they think went into a successful diet to goal weight and they will say I had a great diet, I just made up my mind, I started at the gym, and other things that focused on what they did and thought they did out of themselves. Practically no one said that events in their family relieved them of chronic anxiety which is what I saw in assessing the family system. Still when there is a symptom in me or my family or a marked change in functioning it’s only because I’ve trained myself that I will put the shift into the context of a serious assessment of the the family system in the background.